Difference between revisions of "Arguably.io"

From arguably.io
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hey guys, welcome to arguably.io, which I hope will become a space to gather organized information about debates, arguments and fact-checks.
arguably.io is a semantically-organized database of arguments, debates and beliefs as well as their interdependencies. The encyclopedia seeks to fairly represent all human beliefs, true or false and help the reader in making a determination about what is true or false. Check out our [[Frequently_asked_questions_(FAQ)|FAQ]] to know more, and join the fun! You can open up your own pages on subjects that you find most interesting, or have a look at our [[Wanted claims]].


If you'd like to contribute, start an account and create some pages. Feel free to produce drafts and unfinished stuff, this is a moment at which all ideas are welcomed and it doesn't matter if things aren't in final form.
'''Volunteers needed'''


What I'd like us to think about is: what are the important structures of philosophical/scientific/journalistic arguments that we would like to gather information about. Once this is decided upon, we will build a semantic wiki structure with categories and stats tracking that allows displaying the content we produce under this form.
We are currently looking for volunteer editors for the following tasks. You do not need to ask permission to become one, just take on the task and start contributing!
* Going around the Internet for a survey of subjects of controversy and filling the [[Wanted claims]] page with ideas on things that aren't covered yet on arguably.io.
* Creating new pages on arguments, mathematical proofs, fact-checks, etc, on any subject present in [[Wanted claims]] or not.
* Creating the Editing namespace to start laying out guides for the new contributors and editing guidelines as to what leads to decisions on the encyclopedia. For instance, what categories can a factual claim be in? Possible, possible with some support, false, ... How will we set the standards for each category?
* Start writing a [[Editing:Editing_on_Arguably|guide]] in the Editing namespace explaining the functionality of [[Template:Claim]] and other functions of the encyclopedia.
* Start monitoring fact-check websites in order to identify the kind of fallacies and detoured "debunking" strategies we will have to call out, and edit the Fallacy namespace accordingly by cataloging every way in which an argument can be deceptive, false, fallacious, etc...
* Feel free to add your own ideas here! [[User:JFG|JFG]] ([[User talk:JFG|talk]]) 21:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)


For instance, for now what comes to mind is that everything on the wiki could be presented as a claim (i.e. each article would be its own claim). A claim could be: false, supported, fallacious with respect with a given argument, unsupported... I'd like us to think about the universe of possible categories in which claims can be divided. Claims could also be the counterclaims of other claims (i.e. "God exists" is the counter-claim of "God does not exist").
<dpl>
  category=Mathematics
  mode=userformat
  uses = Template:Claim
  count=10
  ordermethod=lastedit
  order=descending
  addeditdate=true
  userdateformat=Y-m-d H:i
  format={| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#e6e6ff"¶!style="background-color:#9999ff" width="500"|Recently Edited in Mathematics,¶|-¶|%DATE%  [[%PAGE%]],,¶|}
</dpl>


Feel free to edit your own pages or even the Main Page here and share your thoughts.
<dpl>
  category=Biology and Medicine
  mode=userformat
  uses = Template:Claim
  count=10
  ordermethod=lastedit
  order=descending
  addeditdate=true
  userdateformat=Y-m-d H:i
  format={| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#e6e6ff"¶!style="background-color:#9999ff" width="500"|Recently Edited in Biology and Medicine,¶|-¶|%DATE%  [[%PAGE%]],,¶|}
</dpl>


For now, here's a couple of things that are on my mind in terms of what we need: Someone to design the $wgLogos and a favicon, some people to lay out structures and standards on how we could evaluate a given claim, how our standards of evidence will function, etc... And perhaps some people to start just playing around adding new articles and content just so we have some models to start from. This should help us see what we need to get started.
<dpl>
  category=History
  mode=userformat
  uses = Template:Claim
  count=10
  ordermethod=lastedit
  order=descending
  addeditdate=true
  userdateformat=Y-m-d H:i
  format={| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#e6e6ff"¶!style="background-color:#9999ff" width="500"|Recently Edited in History,¶|-¶|%DATE%  [[%PAGE%]],,¶|}
</dpl>


It would also be good to have someone who is talented in graphics. Think about a general graphic interface that would be good to lay out any argument, any claim, any counter-claim to it, any fallacies applying to these claims, etc... If you can design it, we can program it into the wiki.
<dpl>
  category=Philosophy
  mode=userformat
  uses = Template:Claim
  count=10
  ordermethod=lastedit
  order=descending
  addeditdate=true
  userdateformat=Y-m-d H:i
  format={| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#e6e6ff"¶!style="background-color:#9999ff" width="500"|Recently Edited in Philosophy,¶|-¶|%DATE%  [[%PAGE%]],,¶|}
</dpl>


[[User:JFG|JFG]] ([[User talk:JFG|talk]]) 18:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC){{DISPLAYTITLE:arguably.io|noerror}}
<dpl>
  category=Article
  namespace=Article
  mode=userformat
  count=10
  ordermethod=lastedit
  order=descending
  addeditdate=true
  userdateformat=Y-m-d H:i
  format={| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#e6e6ff"¶!style="background-color:#9999ff" width="500"|Recently Edited Journalistic Articles,¶|-¶|%DATE%  [[%TITLE%]],,¶|}
</dpl>
{{DISPLAYTITLE:arguably.io}}

Latest revision as of 03:13, 24 January 2022

arguably.io is a semantically-organized database of arguments, debates and beliefs as well as their interdependencies. The encyclopedia seeks to fairly represent all human beliefs, true or false and help the reader in making a determination about what is true or false. Check out our FAQ to know more, and join the fun! You can open up your own pages on subjects that you find most interesting, or have a look at our Wanted claims.

Volunteers needed

We are currently looking for volunteer editors for the following tasks. You do not need to ask permission to become one, just take on the task and start contributing!

  • Going around the Internet for a survey of subjects of controversy and filling the Wanted claims page with ideas on things that aren't covered yet on arguably.io.
  • Creating new pages on arguments, mathematical proofs, fact-checks, etc, on any subject present in Wanted claims or not.
  • Creating the Editing namespace to start laying out guides for the new contributors and editing guidelines as to what leads to decisions on the encyclopedia. For instance, what categories can a factual claim be in? Possible, possible with some support, false, ... How will we set the standards for each category?
  • Start writing a guide in the Editing namespace explaining the functionality of Template:Claim and other functions of the encyclopedia.
  • Start monitoring fact-check websites in order to identify the kind of fallacies and detoured "debunking" strategies we will have to call out, and edit the Fallacy namespace accordingly by cataloging every way in which an argument can be deceptive, false, fallacious, etc...
  • Feel free to add your own ideas here! JFG (talk) 21:20, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Recently Edited in Mathematics
2022-02-08 22:09 Pi is transcendental
2022-01-24 18:48 Prime factorization is unique
2022-01-23 22:20 If a prime divides a product it divides one of the factors
2022-01-23 14:13 Every rational number has an irreducible representation
2022-01-23 04:40 The square root of 2 is irrational
2022-01-22 20:59 Any integer bigger than 1 is the multiple of a prime
2022-01-22 20:59 An integer and its successor are co-prime
2022-01-22 20:59 There are infinitely many primes
Recently Edited in Biology and Medicine
2022-02-09 17:37 Charles Darwin Committed Plagiarism
2022-02-05 19:51 People are born gay
2022-01-27 14:28 Biological sex is not binary
2022-01-27 04:49 The mind is quantum in nature
2022-01-27 03:35 Race exists
2022-01-23 05:28 Ivermectin has beneficial effects against SARS-COV-2
2022-01-23 01:36 SARS-COV-2 has never been isolated
2022-01-22 21:14 Prophylaxis is wrong
2022-01-22 21:14 Viagra can cure COVID-19
Recently Edited in History
2022-04-16 01:45 Russia lied about the sinking of the Moskva
2022-02-14 02:12 Germany is responsible for World War I
2022-01-27 23:42 The First Crusade was an unprovoked war of aggression
2022-01-22 21:07 Structural Liberalism
Recently Edited in Philosophy
2022-01-25 22:11 The is/ought gap
2022-01-23 23:30 Denial of the is/ought gap
Recently Edited Journalistic Articles
2022-03-12 05:26 Article:Why the word 'freedom' is such a useful rallying cry for protesters
2022-02-05 23:44 Article: Why experts say Premier Moe's claim vaccines no longer protect against COVID-19 is based on misunderstanding
2022-01-22 21:24 Article:NOT REAL NEWS: A look at what didn’t happen this week
Retrieved from "https://arguably.io/index.php?title=Arguably.io&oldid=486"