Difference between revisions of "Any integer bigger than 1 is the multiple of a prime"

From arguably.io
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 12: Line 12:
|Nature=Theoretical
|Nature=Theoretical
|Counterclaim=
|Counterclaim=
|DependentOn1=A positive integer must be a prime or a multiple of smaller primes
|DependentOn1=A positive integer bigger than 1 must be a prime or a multiple of smaller primes
|DependencyOf1=There are infinitely many primes
|DependencyOf1=There are infinitely many primes
}}
}}

Revision as of 23:12, 19 January 2022

Any integer bigger than 1 is the multiple of a prime is a basic result in number theory, which can be proved by Reductio ad absurdum.

Assume there are integers bigger than 1 that are not the multiple of a prime, and let a be the smallest of them. Therefore every integer between 1 and a is the multiple of a prime. If a was a multiple of any number between 1 and a it would therefore also be a multiple of a prime, contradictory to our assumption. But a can neither be a multiple of an integer bigger than itself. So a is only divisible by itself and 1, making it prime, again in contradiction to the assumption. So the assumption has to be false.

Claim
Statement of the claim Any integer bigger than 1 is the multiple of a prime
Level of certainty Proven
Nature Theoretical
Counterclaim
Dependent on

A positive integer bigger than 1 must be a prime or a multiple of smaller primes

Dependency of

There are infinitely many primes

References