Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prophylaxis is wrong"

From arguably.io
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Loving this idea [[User:Arthur]]! Would love to see a list of the arguments pros and cons and I'll start designing structured data and a graphical interface to present them well! [[User:JFG|JFG]] ([[User talk:JFG|talk]]) 20:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Loving this idea [[User:InfiniteJester|InfiniteJester]]! Would love to see a list of the arguments pros and cons and I'll start designing structured data and a graphical interface to present them well! [[User:JFG|JFG]] ([[User talk:JFG|talk]]) 20:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 
One thing that comes to mind is the public health experts' position on abuse of antibacterial agents being bad, which comes in contradiction to vaccines being good. [[User:JFG|JFG]] ([[User talk:JFG|talk]]) 21:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:29, 15 January 2022

Loving this idea InfiniteJester! Would love to see a list of the arguments pros and cons and I'll start designing structured data and a graphical interface to present them well! JFG (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

One thing that comes to mind is the public health experts' position on abuse of antibacterial agents being bad, which comes in contradiction to vaccines being good. JFG (talk) 21:29, 15 January 2022 (UTC)