Difference between revisions of "Darwin2049/chatgpt4 omega evolutionary"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) |
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[File:CG4EnsembleIF01.jpeg|right|500px|Highly Technical Interaction Modalities]] | [[File:CG4EnsembleIF01.jpeg|right|500px|Highly Technical Interaction Modalities]] | ||
Because this might be the most effective way to convey new developments or discoveries. For users who have little or no familiarity with these domains the interaction pathways and control mechanisms could well be unintelligible. <BR />Existing interface systems allow for spoken commands. A user can present verbal commands to a wide variety of systems using simple spoken direct language. Increasingly many applications and websites use verbal output as a mean to facilitate simplified interaction. The more sophisticated interface approaches will use combinations of these to expedite task progress. Looking forward there will be a proliferation of large to very large screen display environments. <BR /> Depending upon the level of sophistication of how the cognitive prosthetic is accessed a highly sophisticated form of equipment might be required in order to perform even simple tasks. Such interaction might make use of some form of VR or AR equipment such equipment like the [[File:AppleVisionPro.jpg|left|400px|Apple Vision Pro]] device. Attempting to access and control the specific system involved might be difficult if not impossible without the appropriate equipment.<BR /> From the other end of the spectrum we should expect to see interfaces that rely on in-ear means of communication with always-on systems. These are likely to merge with the rapidly developing visual display devices that are worn like a pair of glasses but which are in fact high resolution display devices that connect the user to an information system of their choice.<BR /> Increasingly going forward interacting with the developing forms of artificial intelligence will require considerable training to control their capabilities. Also these user interfaces likely to become much more tailored to meet specific task needs. | Because this might be the most effective way to convey new developments or discoveries. For users who have little or no familiarity with these domains the interaction pathways and control mechanisms could well be unintelligible. <BR />Existing interface systems allow for spoken commands. A user can present verbal commands to a wide variety of systems using simple spoken direct language. Increasingly many applications and websites use verbal output as a mean to facilitate simplified interaction. The more sophisticated interface approaches will use combinations of these to expedite task progress. Looking forward there will be a proliferation of large to very large screen display environments. <BR /> Depending upon the level of sophistication of how the cognitive prosthetic is accessed a highly sophisticated form of equipment might be required in order to perform even simple tasks. Such interaction might make use of some form of VR or AR equipment such equipment like the [[File:AppleVisionPro.jpg|left|400px|Apple Vision Pro]] device. Attempting to access and control the specific system involved might be difficult if not impossible without the appropriate equipment.<BR /> From the other end of the spectrum we should expect to see interfaces that rely on in-ear means of communication with always-on systems. These are likely to merge with the rapidly developing visual display devices that are worn like a pair of glasses but which are in fact high resolution display devices that connect the user to an information system of their choice.<BR /> Increasingly going forward interacting with the developing forms of artificial intelligence will require considerable training to control their capabilities. Also these user interfaces likely to become much more tailored to meet specific task needs. | ||
* '''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Political/Competitive:</SPAN>''''' how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control. | * '''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Political/Competitive:</SPAN>''''' how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control. We should expect that groups with well focused public agendas will seize the opportunity to use the most advanced tools available to further their fortunes. The nature of any political system means cutting a pie of finite size. The members of any group can be counted on to on the lookout for any means to further their standing with their constituencies. Therefore we should expect to see messaging from those political groups with the technical sophistication to use the new knowledge based tools to refine and tailor their messaging. <BR /> Proof of this can be seen in the Netflix documentary called "The Great Hack". During the documentary the viewer is presented with the process of how voter information was used to target highly specific messages to prospective voters. The political campaigns that present considerable detail on how this technology was used included the American presidential election of 2016. The other political campaign that is discussed was how the company called Cambridge Analytica targeted messaging to British voters to vote in favor of the Brexit initiative. | ||
We should expect that groups with well focused public agendas will seize the opportunity to use the most advanced tools available to further their fortunes. The nature of any political system means cutting a pie of finite size. The members of any group can be counted on to on the lookout for any means to further their standing with their constituencies. Therefore we should expect to see messaging from those political groups with the technical sophistication to use the new knowledge based tools to refine and tailor their messaging. <BR /> Proof of this can be seen in the Netflix documentary called "The Great Hack". During the documentary the viewer is presented with the process of how voter information was used to target highly specific messages to prospective voters. The political campaigns that present considerable detail on how this technology was used included the American presidential election of 2016. The other political campaign that is discussed was how the company called Cambridge Analytica targeted messaging to British voters to vote in favor of the Brexit initiative. | |||
'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_political Political - Synthesis]</SPAN>''''' | '''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_political Political - Synthesis]</SPAN>''''' | ||
*'''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Evolutionary/Stratification:</SPAN>''''' might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves. In general when we refer to evolutionary changes or adaptations our thoughts tend to gravitate toward periods of time that are measured in very long spans of time. This has been by and large because changes have been based upon natural selection acting upon hereditary adaptation to changed internal or external conditions. In the current context we envision changes happening as a result of competitive pressures operating in a new if artificial environment. That environment is a creation of the combination of social-cultural-economic forces interacting with scientific-technological developments. These forces each operate with their own imperatives and they each have their own feedback mechanisms. Based upon our research to date we foresee evolutionary pressures to use CP capabilities to gain and sustain competitive advantage comparable to those that condition natural selection and survival of the fittest. On the horizon several developments have come into focus that suggest further refinement and inclusion. | --> | ||
** | *'''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Evolutionary/Stratification:</SPAN>''''' might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves. <BR /> In general when we refer to evolutionary changes or adaptations our thoughts tend to gravitate toward periods of time that are measured in very long spans of time. This has been by and large because changes have been based upon natural selection acting upon hereditary adaptation to changed internal or external conditions. In the current context we envision changes happening as a result of competitive pressures operating in a new if artificial environment. That environment is a creation of the combination of social-cultural-economic forces interacting with scientific-technological developments. These forces each operate with their own imperatives and they each have their own feedback mechanisms. | ||
** | Based upon our research to date we foresee evolutionary pressures to use CP capabilities to gain and sustain competitive advantage comparable to those that condition natural selection and survival of the fittest. On the horizon several developments have come into focus that suggest further refinement and inclusion. | ||
** | ** Cognitive Augmentation. | ||
** Temporary Psycho-active Enhancements. | |||
** | ** Long Term Psycho-active Enhancements. | ||
** | ** Permanent Psycho-Physical Modifications. | ||
** Always-On Collaborative Problem Solving. | |||
'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_evolutionary Evolutionary/Stratification]</SPAN>''''' | '''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_evolutionary Evolutionary/Stratification]</SPAN>''''' | ||
*'''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Epistemological/Ethical | *'''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Epistemological/Ethical relativism:</SPAN>''''' how to reconcile ethical issues within a society, between societies; more specifically, might it provide solutions or results that are acceptable to the one group but unacceptable to the other group; recent attention has been drawn to the evidence that a LLM such as CG4 may begin to exhibit sycophancy in its interactions with a user; even if the value stance of the user can be considered as an equivocation. <BR /> | ||
'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/CG4_%E2%80%93_Questions_%CE%B1 Back to Root-Questions]</SPAN>''''' | '''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/CG4_%E2%80%93_Questions_%CE%B1 Back to Root-Questions]</SPAN>''''' | ||
Revision as of 00:24, 23 September 2023
OpenAI - ChatGPT4.
In what follows we attempt to address several basic questions about the onrushing progress with the current focus of artificial intelligence. There are several competing actors in this space. These include OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic, and Cohere. A number of other competitors are active in the artificial intelligence market place. But for purposes of brevity and because of the overlap we will limit focus on ChatGPT4 (CG4). Further, we focus on several salient questions that that raise questions of safety, risk and prospects.
Specifically, risks that involve or are:
- Interfacing/Access: how will different groups interact with, respond to and be affected by it; might access modalities available to one group have positive or negative implications for other groups.
Interfacing - Synthesis. - Evolutionary/Stratification: might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves.
In general when we refer to evolutionary changes or adaptations our thoughts tend to gravitate toward periods of time that are measured in very long spans of time. This has been by and large because changes have been based upon natural selection acting upon hereditary adaptation to changed internal or external conditions. In the current context we envision changes happening as a result of competitive pressures operating in a new if artificial environment. That environment is a creation of the combination of social-cultural-economic forces interacting with scientific-technological developments. These forces each operate with their own imperatives and they each have their own feedback mechanisms.
Based upon our research to date we foresee evolutionary pressures to use CP capabilities to gain and sustain competitive advantage comparable to those that condition natural selection and survival of the fittest. On the horizon several developments have come into focus that suggest further refinement and inclusion.
- Cognitive Augmentation.
- Temporary Psycho-active Enhancements.
- Long Term Psycho-active Enhancements.
- Permanent Psycho-Physical Modifications.
- Always-On Collaborative Problem Solving.
- Epistemological/Ethical relativism: how to reconcile ethical issues within a society, between societies; more specifically, might it provide solutions or results that are acceptable to the one group but unacceptable to the other group; recent attention has been drawn to the evidence that a LLM such as CG4 may begin to exhibit sycophancy in its interactions with a user; even if the value stance of the user can be considered as an equivocation.