Difference between revisions of "Fallacy:Attacking a strawman"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GrapeSkoda (talk | contribs) |
GrapeSkoda (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
"Limiting yourself to one fruit is ridiculous. | "Limiting yourself to one fruit is ridiculous. | ||
You don't like limes or oranges? | You don't like limes or oranges? | ||
What about tangerines? You need other vitamins as-well" | What about tangerines? You need other vitamins as-well." |
Latest revision as of 04:12, 27 January 2022
A Strawman is a form of argument and an informal fallacy.
It is when the party attempting to refute an argument, instead creates a new argument within their retort (usually superficial, non-sequitur or simple to refute) and goes on to rebut said replaced argument - avoiding the initial point altogether. This can be done through exaggeration, misrepresentation or complete fabrication of the persons argument into an absurdity.
Person A presents argument: X
Person B distorts argument X into argument: Y
Person B refutes argument Y
Example:
"Guavas have the highest Vitamin C content of any fruit."
"Limiting yourself to one fruit is ridiculous. You don't like limes or oranges? What about tangerines? You need other vitamins as-well."