Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arguably.io"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Can’t wait for: THE BIG ONE^^ [[User:Antaios|Antaios]] ([[User talk:Antaios|talk]]) 16:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC) | Can’t wait for: THE BIG ONE^^ [[User:Antaios|Antaios]] ([[User talk:Antaios|talk]]) 16:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
Shall we include claims of the future (predictive claims such as, for example, 'Andy Warski will contract AIDs within the next seven years')? A predictive claim such as 'The average global temperature will rise by 1 degree Celsius within the next five years' can never be proven true or false, but only possible, possible but lacking evidence, possible with some support... I'm skeptical about the utility of such predictive claims on this wiki; Such claims could become messy. Perhaps we should let the reader speculate regarding the future, make his own inferences, rather than write about predictive claims. | |||
[[User:Cyanide Taste Sampler|Cyanide Taste Sampler]] ([[User talk:Cyanide Taste Sampler|talk]]) 22 January 2022 | |||
Revision as of 22:54, 22 January 2022
LET's GOOO!!! God Bless you JFG :) Kind Regards, - Big Time Papi Chulo
/:)
JFG (talk) 20:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Can’t wait for: THE BIG ONE^^ Antaios (talk) 16:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Shall we include claims of the future (predictive claims such as, for example, 'Andy Warski will contract AIDs within the next seven years')? A predictive claim such as 'The average global temperature will rise by 1 degree Celsius within the next five years' can never be proven true or false, but only possible, possible but lacking evidence, possible with some support... I'm skeptical about the utility of such predictive claims on this wiki; Such claims could become messy. Perhaps we should let the reader speculate regarding the future, make his own inferences, rather than write about predictive claims. Cyanide Taste Sampler (talk) 22 January 2022