Difference between revisions of "Fallacy:Appeal to authority"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GrapeSkoda (talk | contribs) (Created page with "An ''appeal to authority'' is a form of argument in which the opinion of an authority on a topic is used as evidence to support an argument. Often used when a layman attempts to make a scientific-argument, without the knowledge, information or capability to understand the content of the scientific argument. -------------------------- Example: "Fossil records suggest that a comet impact caused the mass-extinction of the dinosaurs." "But Prof. Weinstein said that it w...") |
GrapeSkoda (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An ''appeal to authority'' is a form of argument in which the opinion of an authority on a topic is used as evidence to support an argument. | An '''appeal to authority''' is a form of argument in which the opinion of an authority on a topic is used as evidence to support an argument. | ||
Often used when a layman attempts to make a scientific-argument, without the knowledge, information or capability to understand the content of the scientific argument. | Often used when a layman attempts to make a scientific-argument, without the knowledge, information or capability to understand the content of the scientific argument. | ||
Revision as of 20:15, 28 January 2022
An appeal to authority is a form of argument in which the opinion of an authority on a topic is used as evidence to support an argument.
Often used when a layman attempts to make a scientific-argument, without the knowledge, information or capability to understand the content of the scientific argument.
Example:
"Fossil records suggest that a comet impact caused the mass-extinction of the dinosaurs."
"But Prof. Weinstein said that it was aliens, and he's a Palaeontologist."