Difference between revisions of "User:Darwin2049/ChatGPT-ScratchPad"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) (ChatGPT 4. Salient questions, issues and considerations) |
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) (ChatGPT 4. Salient questions, issues and considerations) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''''' Considerations. Context. Framing. ''''' | ''''' Considerations. Context. Framing. ''''' | ||
<span style="color:#0000FF">'''''Interface Questions.'''''</span> This is presented as a multifaceted question. Its focus is on the risks associated with how target audiences access and use the system. The list of focal topics as currently understood but which may grow over time include: | |||
* how this new technology will respond and interact with different communities; | |||
* how will these different communities interact with this new technology; | |||
* what if any limitations or “guard rails” are in evidence or should be considered depending upon the usage focus area; | |||
* might one access modality inherit certain privileges and capabilities be considered safe for one group but risk for other groups; if so, how might the problem of “leakage” be addressed; | |||
* in the event of an unintended “leakages” (i.e. “leaky interface”) what might be the implications of the insights, results, capabilities | |||
Revision as of 01:49, 5 April 2023
Considerations. Context. Framing.
Interface Questions. This is presented as a multifaceted question. Its focus is on the risks associated with how target audiences access and use the system. The list of focal topics as currently understood but which may grow over time include:
- how this new technology will respond and interact with different communities;
- how will these different communities interact with this new technology;
- what if any limitations or “guard rails” are in evidence or should be considered depending upon the usage focus area;
- might one access modality inherit certain privileges and capabilities be considered safe for one group but risk for other groups; if so, how might the problem of “leakage” be addressed;
- in the event of an unintended “leakages” (i.e. “leaky interface”) what might be the implications of the insights, results, capabilities