Difference between revisions of "Talk:The is/ought gap"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I think this article would need much more detailed demonstration. The facts remaining separate from the should in these sentences is one thing, but it's another one to make the full proof that the gap exists between any fact and morals. Someone will have to go back to Hume and lay out the structure of his full proof. ~~~~") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think this article would need much more detailed demonstration. The facts remaining separate from the should in these sentences is one thing, but it's another one to make the full proof that the gap exists between any fact and morals. Someone will have to go back to Hume and lay out the structure of his full proof. [[User:JFG|JFG]] ([[User talk:JFG|talk]]) 03:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC) | I think this article would need much more detailed demonstration. The facts remaining separate from the should in these sentences is one thing, but it's another one to make the full proof that the gap exists between any fact and morals. Someone will have to go back to Hume and lay out the structure of his full proof. [[User:JFG|JFG]] ([[User talk:JFG|talk]]) 03:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
: There are things to include and clarify, but I've taken the first steps towards this revamp. [[User:Naberius|Naberius]] 21:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:39, 24 January 2022
I think this article would need much more detailed demonstration. The facts remaining separate from the should in these sentences is one thing, but it's another one to make the full proof that the gap exists between any fact and morals. Someone will have to go back to Hume and lay out the structure of his full proof. JFG (talk) 03:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- There are things to include and clarify, but I've taken the first steps towards this revamp. Naberius 21:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)