Difference between revisions of "Fallacy:Attacking a strawman"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GrapeSkoda (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy. It is when the party attempting to refute an argument, instead creates a new argument within their retort (usually superficial, non-sequitur or simple to refute) and goes on to rebut said replaced argument - avoiding the initial point altogether. This can be done through exaggeration, misrepresentation or complete fabrication of the persons argument into an absurdity. --------------------- Person A presents ar...") |
GrapeSkoda (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Example: | Example: | ||
" | "Guavas have the highest Vitamin C content of any fruit." | ||
"You don't like | "You don't like limes or oranges? | ||
What about tangerines? They | What about tangerines? They have a lot too. | ||
Limiting yourself to one fruit is ridiculous." | Limiting yourself to one fruit is ridiculous." | ||
Revision as of 03:57, 27 January 2022
A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy.
It is when the party attempting to refute an argument, instead creates a new argument within their retort (usually superficial, non-sequitur or simple to refute) and goes on to rebut said replaced argument - avoiding the initial point altogether. This can be done through exaggeration, misrepresentation or complete fabrication of the persons argument into an absurdity.
Person A presents argument: X
Person B distorts argument X into argument: Y
Person B refutes argument Y
Example:
"Guavas have the highest Vitamin C content of any fruit."
"You don't like limes or oranges? What about tangerines? They have a lot too. Limiting yourself to one fruit is ridiculous."