Difference between revisions of "Fallacy:Attacking a strawman"

From arguably.io
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 19: Line 19:
"Limiting yourself to one fruit is ridiculous.
"Limiting yourself to one fruit is ridiculous.
You don't like limes or oranges?
You don't like limes or oranges?
What about tangerines? You need other vitamins as-well"
What about tangerines? You need other vitamins as-well."

Latest revision as of 04:12, 27 January 2022

A Strawman is a form of argument and an informal fallacy.

It is when the party attempting to refute an argument, instead creates a new argument within their retort (usually superficial, non-sequitur or simple to refute) and goes on to rebut said replaced argument - avoiding the initial point altogether. This can be done through exaggeration, misrepresentation or complete fabrication of the persons argument into an absurdity.


Person A presents argument: X

Person B distorts argument X into argument: Y

Person B refutes argument Y


Example:

"Guavas have the highest Vitamin C content of any fruit."

"Limiting yourself to one fruit is ridiculous. You don't like limes or oranges? What about tangerines? You need other vitamins as-well."