Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arguably.io"
(Added example editor/explaner page link) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Here is the link: https://codepen.io/DG1986/pen/XWeveyZ?editors=1000 | Here is the link: https://codepen.io/DG1986/pen/XWeveyZ?editors=1000 | ||
If anyone is interested I will continue it. | If anyone is interested I will continue it. | ||
[[ | [[User:PapiChulo|PapiChulo]] ([[User talk:PapiChulo|talk]]) 22 January 2022 | ||
Revision as of 00:20, 23 January 2022
LET's GOOO!!! God Bless you JFG :) Kind Regards, - Big Time Papi Chulo
/:)
JFG (talk) 20:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Can’t wait for: THE BIG ONE^^ Antaios (talk) 16:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Shall we include claims of the future (predictive claims such as, for example, 'Andy Warski will contract AIDs within the next seven years')? A predictive claim such as 'The average global temperature will rise by 1 degree Celsius within the next five years' can never be proven true or false, but only possible, possible but lacking evidence, possible with some support... I'm skeptical about the utility of such predictive claims on this wiki; Such claims could become messy. Perhaps we should let the reader speculate regarding the future, make his own inferences, rather than write about predictive claims. Cyanide Taste Sampler (talk) 22 January 2022
I Made an example editing page with an editing modal and explanatory text about various parts of an argument. The code runs in a sandbox on Codepen.io (safe to view). I used bootstrap (prototyping only). Here is the link: https://codepen.io/DG1986/pen/XWeveyZ?editors=1000 If anyone is interested I will continue it. PapiChulo (talk) 22 January 2022