Difference between revisions of "ChatGPT4-Questions/User:Darwin2049/Overview"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) |
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
**'''''malicious actors''''' should be expected to formulate highly elaborate netcentric attacks; we should expect that elaborate collections of actions, bait and switch, false flag and seemingly random but covertly connected acts of sabotage to become the new normal; | **'''''malicious actors''''' should be expected to formulate highly elaborate netcentric attacks; we should expect that elaborate collections of actions, bait and switch, false flag and seemingly random but covertly connected acts of sabotage to become the new normal; | ||
**'''''theoretical risks''''' are speculative; but are based upon what is know known and are intended to spotlight what is possible within the purview of known capabilities; | **'''''theoretical risks''''' are speculative; but are based upon what is know known and are intended to spotlight what is possible within the purview of known capabilities; | ||
*'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/User:Darwin2049/ChatGPT4_Intermediate_Considerations Intermediate Considerations.]</SPAN>''''' | |||
--> | --> | ||
<!-- If we step back for a moment and summarize what some observers have had to say about this new capability then we might tentatively start with that: | <!-- If we step back for a moment and summarize what some observers have had to say about this new capability then we might tentatively start with that: | ||
** is based upon and is a refinement of its predecessor, the Chat GPT 3.5 system; | ** is based upon and is a refinement of its predecessor, the Chat GPT 3.5 system; | ||
Revision as of 21:07, 26 October 2023
OpenAI - ChatGPT4.
In what follows we attempt to address several basic questions about the onrushing progress with the current focus of artificial intelligence. There are several competing actors in this space. These include OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic, and Cohere. A number of other competitors are active in the artificial intelligence market place. But for purposes of brevity and because of the overlap we will limit focus on ChatGPT4 (CG4). Further, we focus on several salient questions that that raise questions of safety, risk and prospects.
Specifically, risks that involve or are:
- Interfacing/Accessibility-Conformability - Synthesis. how will different groups interact with, respond to and be affected by it; might access modalities available to one group have positive or negative implications for other groups;
- Political/Competitive - Synthesis. how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control;
- Evolutionary/Stratification - Synthesis. might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves;
- Caveats.
After assessing the range of sentiment from very well informed observers and experts our conclusion is that a summary of caveats and qualifications might help in constraining and focusing the discussion going forward.
Back to root page: ChatGPT4-Questions