Difference between revisions of "ChatGPT4-Questions/User:Darwin2049/Overview"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) |
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
*'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_political Political/Competitive - Synthesis.]</SPAN>''''' <Span Style="COLOR:WHITE; BACKGROUND:TEAL"> how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control;</SPAN> | *'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_political Political/Competitive - Synthesis.]</SPAN>''''' <Span Style="COLOR:WHITE; BACKGROUND:TEAL"> how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control;</SPAN> | ||
*'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_evolutionary Evolutionary/Stratification - Synthesis.]</SPAN>''''' <Span Style="COLOR:WHITE; BACKGROUND:TEAL"> might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves;</SPAN><BR /> | *'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_evolutionary Evolutionary/Stratification - Synthesis.]</SPAN>''''' <Span Style="COLOR:WHITE; BACKGROUND:TEAL"> might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves;</SPAN><BR /> | ||
'''''RESTART RIGHT HERE! ''''' | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
*'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Https://arguably.io/User:Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_epistemological Epistemological/Ethical Relativism - Synthesis]</SPAN>'''''<Span Style="COLOR:WHITE; BACKGROUND:TEAL"> how to reconcile ethical issues within a society, between societies; more specifically, might it provide solutions or results that are acceptable to the one group but unacceptable to the other group;</SPAN><BR /> | *'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Https://arguably.io/User:Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_epistemological Epistemological/Ethical Relativism - Synthesis]</SPAN>'''''<Span Style="COLOR:WHITE; BACKGROUND:TEAL"> how to reconcile ethical issues within a society, between societies; more specifically, might it provide solutions or results that are acceptable to the one group but unacceptable to the other group;</SPAN><BR /> | ||
| Line 71: | Line 74: | ||
<!-- ************************************************************************************* --> | <!-- ************************************************************************************* --> | ||
<!-- ************************************************************************************* --> | <!-- ************************************************************************************* --> | ||
<!-- | |||
*'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/User:Darwin2049/chatgpt4_caveats Caveats.]</SPAN>''''' <BR />After assessing the range of sentiment from very well informed observers and experts our conclusion is that a summary of caveats and qualifications might help in constraining and focusing the discussion going forward. | *'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/User:Darwin2049/chatgpt4_caveats Caveats.]</SPAN>''''' <BR />After assessing the range of sentiment from very well informed observers and experts our conclusion is that a summary of caveats and qualifications might help in constraining and focusing the discussion going forward. | ||
--> | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
* '''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:SILVER">An inflection point</SPAN>''''' either has or momentarily will be or has been reached; | * '''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:SILVER">An inflection point</SPAN>''''' either has or momentarily will be or has been reached; | ||
Revision as of 21:08, 26 October 2023
OpenAI - ChatGPT4.
In what follows we attempt to address several basic questions about the onrushing progress with the current focus of artificial intelligence. There are several competing actors in this space. These include OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic, and Cohere. A number of other competitors are active in the artificial intelligence market place. But for purposes of brevity and because of the overlap we will limit focus on ChatGPT4 (CG4). Further, we focus on several salient questions that that raise questions of safety, risk and prospects.
Specifically, risks that involve or are:
- Interfacing/Accessibility-Conformability - Synthesis. how will different groups interact with, respond to and be affected by it; might access modalities available to one group have positive or negative implications for other groups;
- Political/Competitive - Synthesis. how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control;
- Evolutionary/Stratification - Synthesis. might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves;
RESTART RIGHT HERE!
Back to root page: ChatGPT4-Questions