Difference between revisions of "Prophylaxis is wrong"
(Testing table displays for templates, don't worry if it doesn't look good right away.) |
m |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Claim=Prophylaxis is wrong | |Claim=Prophylaxis is wrong | ||
|Nature=Ethical | |Nature=Ethical | ||
|Counterclaims= | |Counterclaims=Prophylaxis is right | ||
|Dependent on= | |Dependent on=Prophylaxis works | ||
|Dependency of=- | |Dependency of=- | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 02:58, 16 January 2022
A prophylactic medical treatment is defined as any treatment or procedure which seeks to prevent illness rather than treat it. These might include:
- childhood vaccines against potential future diseases (both common and rare) - booster doses of vaccines (e.g., a tetanus shot given after possible exposure to the pathogen) - antibiotics (e.g., when given to a patient undergoing surgery) - antiviral therapies (e.g., drugs that are meant to prevent transmission of HIV) - preemptive surgical removal of body parts in healthy individuals (e.g., circumcision, appendectomy, mastectomy) - taking of nutritional supplements to prevent illness
Avoiding behaviours that pose a risk of illness will not be considered (e.g., not smoking to avoid lung cancer). Only active interventions will be considered as prophylactic.
Arguments for and against prophylaxis, both from a deontological (rule-based) and consequentialist perspective will be weighed against each other.
Statement of the claim | Prophylaxis is wrong |
Level of certainty | {{{Level}}}Property "Level" (as page type) with input value "{{{Level}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process. |
Nature | Ethical |
Counterclaim | {{{Counterclaim}}}Property "Counterclaim of" (as page type) with input value "{{{Counterclaim}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process. |
Dependent on | |
Dependency of |