Difference between revisions of "Darwin2049/chatgpt4 omega evolutionary"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) |
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[File:CG4EnsembleIF01.jpeg|right|500px|Highly Technical Interaction Modalities]] | [[File:CG4EnsembleIF01.jpeg|right|500px|Highly Technical Interaction Modalities]] | ||
Because this might be the most effective way to convey new developments or discoveries. For users who have little or no familiarity with these domains the interaction pathways and control mechanisms could well be unintelligible. <BR />Existing interface systems allow for spoken commands. A user can present verbal commands to a wide variety of systems using simple spoken direct language. Increasingly many applications and websites use verbal output as a mean to facilitate simplified interaction. The more sophisticated interface approaches will use combinations of these to expedite task progress. Looking forward there will be a proliferation of large to very large screen display environments. <BR /> Depending upon the level of sophistication of how the cognitive prosthetic is accessed a highly sophisticated form of equipment might be required in order to perform even simple tasks. Such interaction might make use of some form of VR or AR equipment such equipment like the [[File:AppleVisionPro.jpg|left|400px|Apple Vision Pro]] device. Attempting to access and control the specific system involved might be difficult if not impossible without the appropriate equipment.<BR /> From the other end of the spectrum we should expect to see interfaces that rely on in-ear means of communication with always-on systems. These are likely to merge with the rapidly developing visual display devices that are worn like a pair of glasses but which are in fact high resolution display devices that connect the user to an information system of their choice.<BR /> Increasingly going forward interacting with the developing forms of artificial intelligence will require considerable training to control their capabilities. Also these user interfaces likely to become much more tailored to meet specific task needs. | Because this might be the most effective way to convey new developments or discoveries. For users who have little or no familiarity with these domains the interaction pathways and control mechanisms could well be unintelligible. <BR />Existing interface systems allow for spoken commands. A user can present verbal commands to a wide variety of systems using simple spoken direct language. Increasingly many applications and websites use verbal output as a mean to facilitate simplified interaction. The more sophisticated interface approaches will use combinations of these to expedite task progress. Looking forward there will be a proliferation of large to very large screen display environments. <BR /> Depending upon the level of sophistication of how the cognitive prosthetic is accessed a highly sophisticated form of equipment might be required in order to perform even simple tasks. Such interaction might make use of some form of VR or AR equipment such equipment like the [[File:AppleVisionPro.jpg|left|400px|Apple Vision Pro]] device. Attempting to access and control the specific system involved might be difficult if not impossible without the appropriate equipment.<BR /> From the other end of the spectrum we should expect to see interfaces that rely on in-ear means of communication with always-on systems. These are likely to merge with the rapidly developing visual display devices that are worn like a pair of glasses but which are in fact high resolution display devices that connect the user to an information system of their choice.<BR /> Increasingly going forward interacting with the developing forms of artificial intelligence will require considerable training to control their capabilities. Also these user interfaces likely to become much more tailored to meet specific task needs. | ||
--> | |||
* '''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Political/Competitive:</SPAN>''''' how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control. We should expect that groups with well focused public agendas will seize the opportunity to use the most advanced tools available to further their fortunes. The nature of any political system means cutting a pie of finite size. The members of any group can be counted on to on the lookout for any means to further their standing with their constituencies. Therefore we should expect to see messaging from those political groups with the technical sophistication to use the new knowledge based tools to refine and tailor their messaging. <BR /> Proof of this can be seen in the Netflix documentary called "The Great Hack". During the documentary the viewer is presented with the process of how voter information was used to target highly specific messages to prospective voters. The political campaigns that present considerable detail on how this technology was used included the American presidential election of 2016. The other political campaign that is discussed was how the company called Cambridge Analytica targeted messaging to British voters to vote in favor of the Brexit initiative. | * '''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Political/Competitive:</SPAN>''''' how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control. | ||
<!-- | |||
We should expect that groups with well focused public agendas will seize the opportunity to use the most advanced tools available to further their fortunes. The nature of any political system means cutting a pie of finite size. The members of any group can be counted on to on the lookout for any means to further their standing with their constituencies. Therefore we should expect to see messaging from those political groups with the technical sophistication to use the new knowledge based tools to refine and tailor their messaging. <BR /> Proof of this can be seen in the Netflix documentary called "The Great Hack". During the documentary the viewer is presented with the process of how voter information was used to target highly specific messages to prospective voters. The political campaigns that present considerable detail on how this technology was used included the American presidential election of 2016. The other political campaign that is discussed was how the company called Cambridge Analytica targeted messaging to British voters to vote in favor of the Brexit initiative. | |||
--> | |||
'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_political Political - Synthesis]</SPAN>''''' | '''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_political Political - Synthesis]</SPAN>''''' | ||
*'''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Evolutionary/Stratification:</SPAN>''''' might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves. <BR /> In general when we refer to evolutionary changes or adaptations our thoughts tend to gravitate toward periods of time that are measured in very long spans of time. This has been by and large because changes have been based upon natural selection acting upon hereditary adaptation to changed internal or external conditions. In the current context we envision changes happening as a result of competitive pressures operating in a new if artificial environment. That environment is a creation of the combination of social-cultural-economic forces interacting with scientific-technological developments. These forces each operate with their own imperatives and they each have their own feedback mechanisms. Based upon our research to date we foresee evolutionary pressures to use CP capabilities to gain and sustain competitive advantage comparable to those that condition natural selection and survival of the fittest. On the horizon several developments have come into focus that suggest further refinement and inclusion. | *'''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Evolutionary/Stratification:</SPAN>''''' might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves. <BR /> In general when we refer to evolutionary changes or adaptations our thoughts tend to gravitate toward periods of time that are measured in very long spans of time. This has been by and large because changes have been based upon natural selection acting upon hereditary adaptation to changed internal or external conditions. In the current context we envision changes happening as a result of competitive pressures operating in a new if artificial environment. That environment is a creation of the combination of social-cultural-economic forces interacting with scientific-technological developments. These forces each operate with their own imperatives and they each have their own feedback mechanisms. Based upon our research to date we foresee evolutionary pressures to use CP capabilities to gain and sustain competitive advantage comparable to those that condition natural selection and survival of the fittest. On the horizon several developments have come into focus that suggest further refinement and inclusion. | ||
** Cognitive Augmentation. This development can arise through systemic means. We can already see how systems such as Watson or Chat GPT4 can be interacted with verbally. Having a voice user interface removes the burden of possessing typing skills or highly refined hand eye skills wherein one is obliged to interact with a pointing device that maps interactive hotspots or areas on a display screen. It is a small step to take to sketch out a work environment wherein a user might have multiple tasks operating concurrently with each having detailed status and operational information being displayed on separate displays. In each case there might be relatively complex task management. Having these different tasks with different response capabilities displayed separately would simplify the cognitive load on the person controlling the processes. This is because these tasks might be progressing at different rates and asynchronously. Voice control would simplify which one to make the active one and direct subsequent status updates or control imperatives. | ** Cognitive Augmentation. This development can arise through systemic means. We can already see how systems such as Watson or Chat GPT4 can be interacted with verbally. Having a voice user interface removes the burden of possessing typing skills or highly refined hand eye skills wherein one is obliged to interact with a pointing device that maps interactive hotspots or areas on a display screen. It is a small step to take to sketch out a work environment wherein a user might have multiple tasks operating concurrently with each having detailed status and operational information being displayed on separate displays. In each case there might be relatively complex task management. Having these different tasks with different response capabilities displayed separately would simplify the cognitive load on the person controlling the processes. This is because these tasks might be progressing at different rates and asynchronously. Voice control would simplify which one to make the active one and direct subsequent status updates or control imperatives. | ||
Revision as of 20:56, 22 September 2023
OpenAI - ChatGPT4.
In what follows we attempt to address several basic questions about the onrushing progress with the current focus of artificial intelligence. There are several competing actors in this space. These include OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic, and Cohere. A number of other competitors are active in the artificial intelligence market place. But for purposes of brevity and because of the overlap we will limit focus on ChatGPT4 (CG4). Further, we focus on several salient questions that that raise questions of safety, risk and prospects.
Specifically, risks that involve or are:
- Interfacing/Access: how will different groups interact with, respond to and be affected by it; might access modalities available to one group have positive or negative implications for other groups.
Interfacing - Synthesis. - Political/Competitive: how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control.
- Evolutionary/Stratification: might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves.
In general when we refer to evolutionary changes or adaptations our thoughts tend to gravitate toward periods of time that are measured in very long spans of time. This has been by and large because changes have been based upon natural selection acting upon hereditary adaptation to changed internal or external conditions. In the current context we envision changes happening as a result of competitive pressures operating in a new if artificial environment. That environment is a creation of the combination of social-cultural-economic forces interacting with scientific-technological developments. These forces each operate with their own imperatives and they each have their own feedback mechanisms. Based upon our research to date we foresee evolutionary pressures to use CP capabilities to gain and sustain competitive advantage comparable to those that condition natural selection and survival of the fittest. On the horizon several developments have come into focus that suggest further refinement and inclusion.- Cognitive Augmentation. This development can arise through systemic means. We can already see how systems such as Watson or Chat GPT4 can be interacted with verbally. Having a voice user interface removes the burden of possessing typing skills or highly refined hand eye skills wherein one is obliged to interact with a pointing device that maps interactive hotspots or areas on a display screen. It is a small step to take to sketch out a work environment wherein a user might have multiple tasks operating concurrently with each having detailed status and operational information being displayed on separate displays. In each case there might be relatively complex task management. Having these different tasks with different response capabilities displayed separately would simplify the cognitive load on the person controlling the processes. This is because these tasks might be progressing at different rates and asynchronously. Voice control would simplify which one to make the active one and direct subsequent status updates or control imperatives.
- Temporary Psycho-active Enhancements. The movie Limitless from 2011 portrayed an individual who gained access to an experimental pharmaceutical that facilitated dramatically improved cognitive focus and long term memory functionality. The protagonist of the movie discovered that he was able to function at a pace that he had heretofore never imagined possible. Along the way the narrative showed that he was able to master several foreign languages in record time and utilize them with very high levels of proficiency. His ability to focus on specific features in a complex process enabled him to perform at levels were uncommon for people who did not have access to his level of cognitive competence. His transformation was temporary and required redosing himself in order to maintain peak performance levels.
- Long Term Psycho-active Enhancements.
- Rapid Skills Acquisition.
- Permanent Psycho-Physical Modifications.
- Always-On Collaborative Problem Solving.
Positives.
Risks.
- Epistemological/Ethical relativism: how to reconcile ethical issues within a society, between societies; more specifically, might it provide solutions or results that are acceptable to the one group but unacceptable to the other group; recent attention has been drawn to the evidence that a LLM such as CG4 may begin to exhibit sycophancy in its interactions with a user; even if the value stance of the user can be considered as an equivocation.