Difference between revisions of "Https://arguably.io/Darwin2049/chatgpt4 omega evolutionary"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) |
Darwin2049 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[File:OPENAI.png|left|220px]] | [[File:OPENAI.png|left|220px]] | ||
'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:SILVER">OpenAI - ChatGPT4.</SPAN>''''' <BR /> In what follows we attempt to address several basic questions about the onrushing progress with the current focus of artificial intelligence. There are several competing actors in this space. These include OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic, and Cohere. A number of other competitors are active in the artificial intelligence market place. But for purposes of brevity and because of the overlap we will limit focus on ChatGPT4 (CG4). Further, we focus on several salient questions that that raise questions of safety, risk and prospects. <BR /> | '''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE; BACKGROUND:SILVER">OpenAI - ChatGPT4.</SPAN>''''' <BR /> In what follows we attempt to address several basic questions about the onrushing progress with the current focus of artificial intelligence. There are several competing actors in this space. These include OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic, and Cohere. A number of other competitors are active in the artificial intelligence market place. But for purposes of brevity and because of the overlap we will limit focus on ChatGPT4 (CG4). Further, we focus on several salient questions that that raise questions of safety, risk and prospects. <BR /> | ||
Specifically, risks that involve or are: | |||
* '''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Interfacing/Access:</SPAN>''''' how will different groups interact with, respond to and be affected by it; might access modalities available to one group have positive or negative implications for other groups.<BR /> | |||
'''''<Span Style="COLOR:BLUE;BACKGROUND:YELLOW">[https://arguably.io/User:Darwin2049/chatgpt4_omega_interface Interfacing - Synthesis.] </SPAN>''''' | |||
* '''''<SPAN STYLE="COLOR:BLUE">Political/Competitive:</SPAN>''''' how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control. | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
[[File:Galois00.jpg|left|400px|Galois Representation]] | [[File:Galois00.jpg|left|400px|Galois Representation]] | ||
--> | --> | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
[[File:Socialnetwork01.jpeg|right|400px|Social Network Analysis]] | [[File:Socialnetwork01.jpeg|right|400px|Social Network Analysis]] | ||
| Line 24: | Line 27: | ||
Because this might be the most effective way to convey new developments or discoveries. For users who have little or no familiarity with these domains the interaction pathways and control mechanisms could well be unintelligible. <BR /> Existing interface systems allow for spoken commands. A user can present verbal commands to a wide variety of systems using simple spoken direct language. Increasingly many applications and websites use verbal output as a mean to facilitate simplified interaction. The more sophisticated interface approaches will use combinations of these to expedite task progress. Looking forward there will be a proliferation of large to very large screen display environments. <BR /> Depending upon the level of sophistication of how the cognitive prosthetic is accessed a highly sophisticated form of equipment might be required in order to perform even simple tasks. <BR /> [[File:AppleVisionPro.jpg|left|400px|Apple Vision Pro]] Such interaction might make use of some form of VR or AR equipment such equipment like the device. Attempting to access and control the specific system involved might be difficult if not impossible without the appropriate equipment.<BR /> From the other end of the spectrum we should expect to see interfaces that rely on in-ear means of communication with always-on systems. These are likely to merge with the rapidly developing visual display devices that are worn like a pair of glasses but which are in fact high resolution display devices that connect the user to an information system of their choice.<BR /> Increasingly going forward interacting with the developing forms of artificial intelligence will require considerable training to control their capabilities. Also these user interfaces likely to become much more tailored to meet specific task needs. | Because this might be the most effective way to convey new developments or discoveries. For users who have little or no familiarity with these domains the interaction pathways and control mechanisms could well be unintelligible. <BR /> Existing interface systems allow for spoken commands. A user can present verbal commands to a wide variety of systems using simple spoken direct language. Increasingly many applications and websites use verbal output as a mean to facilitate simplified interaction. The more sophisticated interface approaches will use combinations of these to expedite task progress. Looking forward there will be a proliferation of large to very large screen display environments. <BR /> Depending upon the level of sophistication of how the cognitive prosthetic is accessed a highly sophisticated form of equipment might be required in order to perform even simple tasks. <BR /> [[File:AppleVisionPro.jpg|left|400px|Apple Vision Pro]] Such interaction might make use of some form of VR or AR equipment such equipment like the device. Attempting to access and control the specific system involved might be difficult if not impossible without the appropriate equipment.<BR /> From the other end of the spectrum we should expect to see interfaces that rely on in-ear means of communication with always-on systems. These are likely to merge with the rapidly developing visual display devices that are worn like a pair of glasses but which are in fact high resolution display devices that connect the user to an information system of their choice.<BR /> Increasingly going forward interacting with the developing forms of artificial intelligence will require considerable training to control their capabilities. Also these user interfaces likely to become much more tailored to meet specific task needs. | ||
--> | --> | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Revision as of 22:31, 29 September 2023
OpenAI - ChatGPT4.
In what follows we attempt to address several basic questions about the onrushing progress with the current focus of artificial intelligence. There are several competing actors in this space. These include OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic, and Cohere. A number of other competitors are active in the artificial intelligence market place. But for purposes of brevity and because of the overlap we will limit focus on ChatGPT4 (CG4). Further, we focus on several salient questions that that raise questions of safety, risk and prospects.
Specifically, risks that involve or are:
- Interfacing/Access: how will different groups interact with, respond to and be affected by it; might access modalities available to one group have positive or negative implications for other groups.
- Political/Competitive: how might different groups or actors gain or lose relative advantage; also, how might it be used as a tool of control.
- Evolutionary/Stratification: might new classifications of social categories emerge; were phenotypical bifurcations to emerge would or how would the manifest themselves.
Evolutionary/Stratification - Synthesis.
- Epistemological/Ethical relativism: how to reconcile ethical issues within a society, between societies; more specifically, might it provide solutions or results that are acceptable to the one group but unacceptable to the other group; recent attention has been drawn to the evidence that a LLM such as CG4 may begin to exhibit sycophancy in its interactions with a user; even if the value stance of the user can be considered as an equivocation;