Difference between revisions of "Wanted claims"
GrapeSkoda (talk | contribs) |
GrapeSkoda (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[American women had no rights prior to their enfranchisement]] -- rights such as property rights, freedom of association, education of women, choice of profession &c.. There is a common misconception of the historically illiterate people with whom I've spoken, that women were denied the same freedoms as men had until they received the ballot and 'voted' their way to freedom. We ought to correct the record. [[User:Cyanide Taste Sampler|Cyanide Taste Sampler]] ([[User talk:Cyanide Taste Sampler|talk]]) 19:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC) | [[American women had no rights prior to their enfranchisement]] -- rights such as property rights, freedom of association, education of women, choice of profession &c.. There is a common misconception of the historically illiterate people with whom I've spoken, that women were denied the same freedoms as men had until they received the ballot and 'voted' their way to freedom. We ought to correct the record. [[User:Cyanide Taste Sampler|Cyanide Taste Sampler]] ([[User talk:Cyanide Taste Sampler|talk]]) 19:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
:Sure, but we would need cited examples of people claiming that explicitly and specifically. Because I know a lot of people appear to take that implicit stance but I'd like to see serious quoting of some people who have truly said that. [[User:JFG|JFG]] ([[User talk:JFG|talk]]) 21:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC) | :Sure, but we would need cited examples of people claiming that explicitly and specifically. Because I know a lot of people appear to take that implicit stance but I'd like to see serious quoting of some people who have truly said that. [[User:JFG|JFG]] ([[User talk:JFG|talk]]) 21:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
I suggest this video: "Jordan Peterson: “There was plenty of motivation to take me out. It just didn't work" | British GQ" on YouTube - from 7:34 to around the 13minute mark. However, she makes reference to it in Britain, rather than America. Her book may contain a more comprehensive review of all the talking-points regarding this subject in the West in general. [[User:GrapeSkoda|GrapeSkoda]] ([[User talk:GrapeSkoda|talk]]) 23:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
[[Race is a social construct]] -- The claim that race and ethnicity are non-existent and cannot be tracked, studied or categorised as a result. | [[Race is a social construct]] -- The claim that race and ethnicity are non-existent and cannot be tracked, studied or categorised as a result. |
Revision as of 23:28, 26 January 2022
Ivermectin has beneficial effects against SARS-COV-2
Ivermectin does not have beneficial effects against SARS-COV-2 -- These two will be quite long because there is quite a lot of peer-reviewed literature that will need to be cited, but if someone wants to try their hand at it, go for it! JFG (talk) 21:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Claim: "Wiki-style rhetorical annotation is a better format for crowdsourcing than other alternatives" Reason for wanting this claim: It is implicit in the use of arguably.io that we are using a wiki-style frontend for rhetorical annotation. What other frontend and backends facilitate rhetorical annotation as well as continuous deployment of epistemic resources?
American women had no rights prior to their enfranchisement -- rights such as property rights, freedom of association, education of women, choice of profession &c.. There is a common misconception of the historically illiterate people with whom I've spoken, that women were denied the same freedoms as men had until they received the ballot and 'voted' their way to freedom. We ought to correct the record. Cyanide Taste Sampler (talk) 19:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, but we would need cited examples of people claiming that explicitly and specifically. Because I know a lot of people appear to take that implicit stance but I'd like to see serious quoting of some people who have truly said that. JFG (talk) 21:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
I suggest this video: "Jordan Peterson: “There was plenty of motivation to take me out. It just didn't work" | British GQ" on YouTube - from 7:34 to around the 13minute mark. However, she makes reference to it in Britain, rather than America. Her book may contain a more comprehensive review of all the talking-points regarding this subject in the West in general. GrapeSkoda (talk) 23:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Race is a social construct -- The claim that race and ethnicity are non-existent and cannot be tracked, studied or categorised as a result. Those arguing against its existence often use the Continuum Fallacy. They also claim that phenotype is an arbitrary indicator of behaviour and genotype; one famous example being from Jane Elliot's eye-colour experiment and subsequent quote: "One race: The Human Race". People often use this experiment to demonstrate that physical differences are superficial, and negative perceptions on these superficialities causes poor performance - when in-fact the experiment does not demonstrate that all differences are superficial, nor that all negative behaviours are or are not a result of someone's genes. -- An extensively cited article can be written regarding the various fallacies used and ways in which race can be reliably categorised via gene-frequencies.