Difference between revisions of "Wanted claims"

From arguably.io
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (Fixing spacing)
Tag: Manual revert
Line 4: Line 4:


Claim: "Wiki-style rhetorical annotation is a better format for crowdsourcing than other alternatives"  
Claim: "Wiki-style rhetorical annotation is a better format for crowdsourcing than other alternatives"  
Reason for wanting this claim: It is implicit in the use of arguably.io that we are using a wiki-style frontend for rhetorical annotation.  
Reason for wanting this claim: It is implicit in the use of arguably.io that we are using a wiki-style frontend for rhetorical annotation.  
What other frontend and backends facilitate rhetorical annotation as well as continuous deployment of epistemic resources?
What other frontend and backends facilitate rhetorical annotation as well as continuous deployment of epistemic resources?

Revision as of 20:15, 23 January 2022

Ivermectin has beneficial effects against SARS-COV-2

Ivermectin does not have beneficial effects against SARS-COV-2 -- These two will be quite long because there is quite a lot of peer-reviewed literature that will need to be cited, but if someone wants to try their hand at it, go for it! JFG (talk) 21:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Claim: "Wiki-style rhetorical annotation is a better format for crowdsourcing than other alternatives" Reason for wanting this claim: It is implicit in the use of arguably.io that we are using a wiki-style frontend for rhetorical annotation. What other frontend and backends facilitate rhetorical annotation as well as continuous deployment of epistemic resources?